Joe Bananas Sr wrote:Not interested......
Next


Bengals1 wrote:I'm tired of filling our club with other teams rejects and has-beens. We've got to get over this idea that if a player was drafted high by somebody he must have talent and somehow we're going to bring it out of them.
SoP needs to realize that some players are just busts and that's all there is to it.....

Stomp wrote:I doubt they're signing Sweed and saying "yep, #2 WR spot is now fixed." It's just a flyer on a guy who has talent and might now be desperate to save his career. If he sucks, he's cut. If he's good, good on us.
I really don't see the problem.


Bengals1 wrote:Stomp wrote:I doubt they're signing Sweed and saying "yep, #2 WR spot is now fixed." It's just a flyer on a guy who has talent and might now be desperate to save his career. If he sucks, he's cut. If he's good, good on us.
I really don't see the problem.
I wouldn't be so sure about that old friend. It wouldn't surprise me one bit if that's exactly how SoP and perhaps even Marvin himself feel about such a signing. How long did they go with low round draft picks and has-beens at the tight end position? And now with Safety?
This club has a history of covering gaping wounds with band-aids and moving along as if everything’s fine....

Deadcat wrote:I view this as a Matt-Jones type signing. The guy had talent. Let's see if there is anything we can salvage. If not, let him go before the season starts. No harm no foul.


Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests